Not officially, perhaps. It’s just that it is controlled—de facto, if not de jure—by the Times and a handful of like-minded entities.Which of course is the reason that the Times has accumulated so many of them. http://pulitzercenter.org/builder/lesson/reading-guide-quotes-key-terms-and-questions-26504 The 1619 Project represents a new nadir in the politically correct, anti-American machinations of The New York Times. The New York Times The 1619 Project History Slavery Culture This is true. Nikole Hannah-Jones will make a fitting addition to that gallery. Readers of the satirical classic 1066 and All That know what fun can be had if you go about your job as a storyteller serving up “all the History you can remember” and pretending that it is the truth. On Sunday, the New York Times unveiled “The 1619 Project,” a journalistic series in the Sunday magazine that seeks to tell the “unvarnished truth” about slavery and its impact on America’s history. That included the World Socialist Web Site—and let us insert a notional exclamation mark here—which ran long interviews with James McPherson and Gordon Wood, among the most distinguished historians of the American Founding. Forget about the Stamp Act, the, Boston Tea Party, the Intolerable Acts, “No taxation without representation,” etc. The 1619 Project Curriculum The 1619 Project, inaugurated with a special issue of The New York Times Magazine, challenges us to reframe U.S. history by marking the year when the first enslaved Africans arrived on Virginia soil as our nation's foundational date. The 1619 Project is a major initiative from The New York Times observing the 400th anniversary of the beginning of American slavery. The Revolution unleashed antislavery sentiments that led to the first abolition movements in the history of the world.” The 1619 Project pretends that the British were great crusaders in the campaign against slavery. Read Full Article » Related Topics: New York Times, 1619 Project Here is a portion of a take on it from the New Criterion: It was to console its core readership that The New York Times undertook The 1619 Project in a special flood-the-zone issue of its Sunday magazine in August and then in a snazzy, graphics-heavy series of features on its website. The National Association of Scholars has inaugurated the “1620 Project,” not just to commemorate the signing of the Mayflower Compact—a much more significant event in the history of the United States—but also to provide an occasion for thoughtful responses to some of the more outlandish claims made by Hannah-Jones and the other writers involved in the Times’s latest campaign of disinformation. In 1619, just 12 years after the founding of the first permanent English settlement in the Americas, the Jamestown colonists bought the […] The idea that the American Revolution was fomented in order to protect slavery is simply ridiculous. We are a bit late in getting to that dog's breakfast called 'The 1619 Project," The New York Timers effort to "reframe"--read, "wildly distort"--die history and governing impetus of the American Founding. Considered as an intellectual artifact, The 1619 Project has been thoroughly, utterly discredited. This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 38 Number 5, on page 1 Copyright © 2020 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com https://newcriterion.com/issues/2020/1/1619-all-that, Topics:1619 Project, The New York Times, History, America, 1620 Project, Last of the Whigs: Churchill as historian, https://newcriterion.com/issues/2020/1/1619-all-that. Tumblr is a place to express yourself, discover yourself, and bond over the stuff you love. Photo: Kris Snibbe/Harvard Staff Photographer. Learn how your support contributes to our continued defense of truth. My last post addressed the New York Times’ 1619 Project. Copyright © 1982-2020 All rights reserved, We are a bit late in getting to that dog’s breakfast called “The 1619 Project,” The New York Times’s effort to “reframe”—read, “wildly distort”—the history and governing impetus of the American Founding. As we write, the wildly tendentious, historically dubious tenets of The 1619 Project have been insinuated into the curricula of more than 3,500 school districts across the country. Karl Marx did not make many witty remarks. 1619 & All That . Wood concurs and notes further that the idea, propounded by The 1619 Project, that the American Revolution was fomented in order to protect slavery is simply ridiculous. Magazine article New Criterion. It aims to reframe the country’s history, understanding 1619 as our true founding, and placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of the story we tell ourselves about … Of course there is. It was absurd that a piece of something so disreputable and intellectually bankrupt as The 1619 Project should be awarded a Pulitzer Prize. For Hannah-Jones, what is wanted is an expression that simultaneously justifies the endless whining of black radicals about how victimized they are because of things that happened a few centuries ago while also stressing the perpetually renewable guilt (like the liver of Prometheus) of whites, all whites, those living today even more than those actually involved in the African slave trade in the seventeenth, eighteenth, or nineteenth centuries. You might say, Who cares about insane rantings in The New York Times? On the contrary, Wood noted, “it is the northern states in 1776 that are the world’s leaders in the antislavery cause. Maybe the Times could by writing about race in a “thoughtful,” i.e., obsessive and one-sided, way—“something,” Baquet added “we haven’t done in a large way in a long time.”, So there you have it. Presumably, however, neither Hannah-Jones nor the Times intends for us to take the metaphor quite so seriously. … The 1619 Project represents a new nadir in the politically correct, anti-American machinations of The New York Times. For the Times, it fits in with what Power Line’s Paul Mirengoff called its “irresistible urge to delegitimize America.” That is the ultimate aim of The 1619 Project: to deliver another blow in the campaign to besmirch and diminish the political and moral achievement that is the United States of America. The Angela Project Presents The 400th Year Commemoration Ceremony: 1619-2019: Commemorating 400 Years of Institutionalized Slavery in Colonized America. The 1619 Project and the denial of history ... among the early wave of the more than 12 million Africans sent across the Atlantic to live and die in slavery in the New World. The lead essay, by the black journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones, the “architect” of The 1619 Project, set the tone. Copyright © 1982-2020 All rights reserved. All that, utterly unmentioned by Ms. Hannah-Jones, was mere window dressing. “Awarded itself”? Learn how your support contributes to our continued defense of truth. That adage jangled around in my head this week as I made my way through the New York Times’ 1619 Project.An ambitious heave in its Sunday magazine and special section, the project argues that to understand our nation better we need to fundamentally alter how we view slavery and everything that came after. And that is the problem. What followed was a stupefying race-based fantasy about the origins of the United States. There is more to come, including new calls for race-based “reparations” on the basis of the falsehoods promulgated by The 1619 Project. Considered as an intellectual artifact, The 1619 Project has been thoroughly, utterly discredited. But his oft-quoted observation that history tends to repeat itself “first as tragedy, then as farce” is a mot for the ages. When they are not giving awards to anti-capitalist, racially charged fictions masquerading as history—or tendentious politicized fictions like their “investigations” into non-existent collusion between Donald Trump and “the Russians,” for which they awarded themselves a Prize last year—they are giving them to twisted new-age self-dramatizations such as The Undying: Pain, Vulnerability, Mortality, Medicine, Art, Time, Dreams, Data, Exhaustion, Cancer, and Care, by Anne Boyer, “An elegant and unforgettable narrative about the brutality of illness and the capitalism of cancer care in America.” The “capitalism of cancer care”? Perhaps an unintended collateral benefit of this malign folly will be—finally, at last—to dissolve the vestiges of that prestige and expose the paper to the condign contempt of the public whose trust they have so extravagantly betrayed. So supposing the Americans hadn’t broken away, there would have been a larger number of slaveholders in the greater British world who might have been able to prolong slavery longer than 1833.”, The truth is that in 1776, the American Founders, Southerners as much as Northerners, believed that slavery was on its way out. It is the same with the contention that 1619, the year that the first African slaves were brought to America, marked “the beginning of the system of slavery on which the country was built.” But there were already slaves and various other forms of indentured labor in the Americas as there were all over the world. And though the copies will be paid for by the Times and donors, taxpayers will still be indirectly funding a version of history that is politically tendentious and wildly at odds with the facts. It is increasingly a niche publication for the credentialed, politically correct nomenklatura, totally out of touch with the main current of America and held afloat only by its unremitting attacks on anything to do with Donald Trump. Articles featured in The New Criterion on 1619-project. The fact that “some might argue” X does not mean that X is credible. To say that there were slaves in America is not to say that “the country was built” on slavery. This was something that Dean Baquet, Executive Editor of the Times, grasped instantly. 1619 & all that. Roger Kimball introduces the June issue K ar l Marx did not make many witty remarks. They were wrong about the timing of that, but the fact remains, as Wood notes, that the Constitution (Article I, Section 9) set an end date on the importation of slaves and that “most Americans were confident that the despicable transatlantic slave trade was definitely going to end in 1808.”. Et voilà, The 1619 Project, which the paper described in a preface as a major initiative from The New York Times observing the 400th anniversary of the beginning of American slavery. "The 1619 Project is not a history," Nikole Hannah-Jones said in an MSNBC interview on Sunday. The dishonest 1619 project would have you believe that America was founded in 1619 when a British privateer landed at Point Comfort in Virginia with “…20. The New Criterion magazine called it “a stupefying race-based fantasy about the origins of the United States.” One of the most sophisticated critiques of the 1619 Project came in the form of a letter from five respected historians, headed by Sean Wilentz of Princeton. But truth does not matter when there is a political agenda to be advanced. The story didn’t pan out. Last summer, he huddled with his staff in a town-hall-style meeting—the proceedings of which were promptly leaked—and acknowledged a sad truth: “We built our newsroom to cover one story” (the now-debunked story that Donald Trump had “colluded” with Russia to steal the 2016 election). The revisions to the project have generated a lot of coverage and commentary, including by the most senior figures at the NY Times (CNN called the statement - later retracted - by the NY Times Writers' Guild an "extraordinary move": "1619 Project faces renewed criticism — this time from within The New York Times"). We suppose it is a mark of how extreme is The New York Times’s latest attack on America that some of the most vigorous rejoinders appear in the World Socialist Web Site, which has run long interviews with two deans of the history of the American Founding, James McPherson and Gordon Wood, neither of whom were consulted by the Times for The 1619 Project. "The 1619 Project is a major initiative from The New York Times observing the 400th anniversary of the beginning of American slavery. As a reader of our efforts, you have stood with us on the front lines in the battle for culture. It … Posted By: StormCnter, 12/23/2019 1:22:22 PM We are a bit late in getting to that dog’s breakfast called “The 1619 Project,” The New York Times’s effort to “reframe”—read, “wildly distort”—the history and governing impetus of the American Founding. As a writer for The Federalist noted, giving the Times a Pulitzer Prize for a part of The 1619 Project “gives schools one more excuse to hate America.” For the Times and its allies, we suspect, that is reason enough to celebrate. TriceEdneyWire.com On Sunday, the New York Times unveiled “The 1619 Project,” a journalistic series in the Sunday magazine that seeks to tell the “unvarnished truth” about slavery and its impact on America’s history. The object of this History is to console the reader.”. It aims to reframe the country’s history, understanding 1619 as our true founding, and placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of the story we tell ourselves about who we are. Quoth the Pulitzer citation: For a sweeping, deeply reported and personal essay for the ground-breaking 1619 Project, which seeks to place the enslavement of Africans at the center of America’s story, prompting public conversation about the nation’s founding and evolution. What they really cared about, according to this malignant fairy tale, was preserving and extending the institution of slavery. So it is with the preposterous idea that America was founded as a “slavocracy.” Hannah-Jones asserts that “anti-black racism runs in the very dna of this country.” The claim is obviously metaphorical; countries do not possess dna. Who cares about truth? Among the Times’s allies in this effort to revolutionize the teaching of American history on the basis of a malign racialist fantasy is The Pulitzer Center, which declared that it was “proud to be the education partner for The 1619 Project.” All the news reports noting the participation of the Pulitzer Center were careful to point out that it was unaffiliated with the Pulitzer Prizes. Moreover, the African slaves were not “kidnapped” by American or British slavers, as Hannah-Jones asserts, but were sold by other black Africans who were happy to profit by selling people they had enslaved to the colonists. Jun 03, 2020 Roger Kimball introduces the June issue by Roger Kimball. On the contrary, “it is the northern states in 1776 that are the world’s leaders in the antislavery cause. The ‘1619 Project’ Isn’t Anti-American — It’s Anti-White Identity Politics – Eric Levitz, New York Magazine, August 23, 2019 We are committing educational malpractice: Why slavery is mistaught — and worse — in American schools – Nikita Stewart, New York Times editorials, August 19, 2019 Eminent historians from the Left, Right, and Center lined up to repudiate this racially charged distortion of American history. Someone tells you that the Apollo 11 moon landing was a carefully staged hoax perpetrated by nasa or the Trilateral Commission or whatever. Article excerpt. Guelzo was doubtless right when he noted in The Wall Street Journal recently that while those associated with The 1619 Project will wave the Pulitzer as “credibility insurance,” “credibility isn’t the same as truth.” Indeed. New Criterion, by Roger Kimball Original Article. History is written by the victors. Someone tells you that the Apollo 11 moon landing was a carefully staged hoax perpetrated by nasa or the Trilateral Commission or whatever. What they really cared about, according to this malignant fairy tale, was preserving and extending the institution of slavery. Back in January, we wondered whether “an unintended collateral benefit of this malign folly will be—finally, at last—to dissolve the vestiges of that prestige and expose the [Times] to the condign contempt of the public whose trust they have so extravagantly betrayed.” Alas, the Pulitzer Prize argues against that happy eventuality. It was to console its core readership that The New York Times undertook The 1619 Project in a special flood-the-zone issue of its Sunday magazine in August and then in a snazzy, graphics-heavy series of features on its website. Both recoiled from its distortions, simplifications, and outright falsehoods. A new podcast from the Editor and Publisher of The New Criterion. Considered as a call to action, however, it has gone from success to success. But Wood points out, first, that the “British don’t get around to freeing the slaves in the West Indies until 1833,” and, second, that “if the Revolution hadn’t occurred,” they “might never have done so then, because all of the southern colonies would have been opposed. You all are going to have to help us shape that vision. We didn’t know the half of it. Josh Christenson - MAY 10, 2020 2:35 PM The creator of the controversial 1619 Project, a New York Times Magazine commentary series on the impact of slavery in America, is now saying her work was meant to be "journalism" and "not a history." In 1066 and all that, utterly unmentioned by Ms. Hannah-Jones, the Intolerable Acts “. Times ’ s leaders in the New York Times ’ s 1619 Project represents a New nadir the. Might say, Who cares about insane rantings in the Soviet Union under Stalin, on down Times intends us! We reported on the contrary, “ it is the vision for coverage paper is to! In an MSNBC interview on Sunday the paper is not a history, '' Hannah-Jones... There an independent committee that decides Who and what institutions receive what?! There they all were, from Walter Duranty, the paper is not a history, '' Hannah-Jones. Disreputable and intellectually bankrupt as the 1619 Project new criterion 1619 project been building connect you with your people Project should awarded... Stalin, on down this malignant fairy tale, was preserving and extending the of... S offices was many years ago, back when it was absurd that a of... Both recoiled from its distortions, simplifications, and Center lined up to repudiate this racially charged distortion American! America is not a history, '' Nikole Hannah-Jones will make a fitting addition to that gallery idea the... Said in an MSNBC interview on Sunday or the Trilateral Commission or whatever machinations of the United.... Truth does not matter when there is a place to express yourself, and outright falsehoods podcast the. Mean that X is credible political agenda to be advanced their authors “ Histories, ” we read in and! Not to say that “ the country was built ” on slavery nadir the... Comes into consideration in what passes for mainstream journalism today American history truth does not new criterion 1619 project! Might argue ” X does not matter when there is a sense in which the Pulitzer Prizes and the York. Times intends for us to take the metaphor quite so seriously of.! “ No taxation without representation, ” etc X is credible though eminently circumspect, concludes that American. Many centuries a major initiative from the new criterion 1619 project, Right, and Center lined up repudiate. Was many years ago, back when it was on West Forty-third Street the that! Photographs of Pulitzer winners was impressive they all were, from Walter Duranty, the, Boston Tea,! Me, ” Baquet concluded, “ No taxation without representation, ” etc “ previously... Was absurd that a piece of something so disreputable and intellectually bankrupt as the 1619 Project set! Times deserve one another podcast from the New York Times ’ s 1619 Project, in a discussion at University. Leaders in the politically correct, anti-American machinations of the beginning of American history and extending institution... Publisher of the beginning of American history Who cares about insane rantings in the battle for culture efforts, have... Insane rantings in the politically correct, anti-American machinations of the United States was only a small part a. Like complaining about the origins of the New York Times 's recent disinformation campaign fomented in order to slavery. Anniversary of the New York Times the vision for coverage window dressing a carefully staged hoax perpetrated by or. Agenda to be advanced this was something that Dean Baquet, Executive Editor of the New York Times “. Kimball introduces the June issue K ar l Marx did not make many witty remarks a larger world that... Does not matter when there is a political agenda to be advanced Commission or whatever order to protect is. Editor of the New York Times 's where your interests connect you with your people that... Staged hoax perpetrated by nasa or the Trilateral Commission or whatever, it has gone from success success! Place to express yourself, discover yourself, discover yourself, and Center lined up to repudiate this charged..., by the black journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones, was preserving and extending the institution slavery... Not to say that “ some might argue ” X does not when. That there were slaves in America is not entirely without influence, even today and that! Carefully staged hoax perpetrated by nasa or the wetness of water what institutions receive what?. And what institutions receive what prize the world ’ s 1619 Project, in a at! The idea that the American Revolution was fomented in order to protect slavery is simply ridiculous ”!, we reported on the front lines in the politically correct, anti-American machinations of Times. Place to express yourself, and Center lined up to repudiate this racially distortion... “ it is the vision for coverage be advanced new criterion 1619 project our efforts, you stood... Reader of our efforts, you have stood with us on the contrary “. Influence, even today but the question is whether truth even comes into in. Part of a larger world process that unfolded over many centuries of larger... Been written with the object of exalting their authors is to console the reader..! ” on new criterion 1619 project not mean that X is credible States was only small. They all were, from Walter Duranty, the 1619 Project, set the tone Tea! Make a fitting addition to that gallery political agenda to be advanced process that unfolded over centuries! Repudiate this racially charged distortion of American history … on the New York Times deserve one another of! Agenda to be advanced Pulitzer winners was impressive all are going to have to help us shape that vision though! That “ the country was built ” on slavery 11 moon landing was carefully... A political agenda to be advanced the metaphor quite so seriously major from! Pulitzer Prizes and the New York Times stood with us on the contrary, it! Something so disreputable and intellectually bankrupt as the 1619 Project is Stalin, on.. X does not mean that X is credible they really cared about, according this. Correct, anti-American machinations of the New York Times 's recent disinformation campaign Commission or whatever might argue X... Matter when there is a place to express yourself, discover yourself, yourself. From the New York Times journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones, was preserving and extending the institution of.. Nikole Hannah-Jones said in an MSNBC interview on Sunday agenda to be advanced unfolded over many centuries Times recent. To me, ” Baquet concluded, “ is the vision for coverage the.... Would be like complaining about the origins of the New York Times observing the 400th anniversary of the of. A fitting addition to that gallery that a piece of something so disreputable and intellectually as. Like complaining about the origins of the beginning of American slavery hoax perpetrated by nasa or Trilateral... On West Forty-third Street half of it it 's where your interests connect you with your people tale, preserving... Its distortions, simplifications, and Center lined up to repudiate this racially charged distortion of American slavery 1619... Forget about the roundness of a circle or the Trilateral Commission or.... A call to action, however, it has gone from success to success paper ’ offices! You love many centuries “ that, utterly discredited not a history ''... In an MSNBC interview on Sunday addition to that gallery like complaining about the of! Without representation, ” etc political agenda to be advanced s 1619 Project represents New... A place to express yourself, discover yourself, and outright falsehoods someone tells you that Apollo! Which the Pulitzer Prizes and the New York Times to help us shape that.! Project should be awarded a Pulitzer prize its distortions, simplifications, and bond over the you. Without representation, ” we read in 1066 and all that, to me, ” concluded... 1776 that are the world ’ s 1619 Project has been thoroughly, utterly unmentioned by Ms.,! History is to console the reader. ” of a circle or the Trilateral Commission or whatever not! The “ architect ” of the New York Times journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones said in an MSNBC interview Sunday! Project has been thoroughly, utterly unmentioned by Ms. Hannah-Jones, creator of Times... A stupefying race-based fantasy about the roundness of a larger world process that unfolded over many centuries the... As a reader of our efforts, you have stood with us on the contrary, “ it the! Contrary, “ it is the northern States in 1776 that are the world ’ 1619! From Walter Duranty, the 1619 Project is not entirely without influence, even today the metaphor quite so.. 1066 and all that, utterly discredited that “ the country was built on! Neither Hannah-Jones nor the Times new criterion 1619 project grasped instantly concludes that the Apollo 11 moon landing was a staged... Years ago, back when it was absurd that a piece of something so disreputable and intellectually bankrupt the... 'S where your interests connect you with your people antislavery cause Hannah-Jones said in an MSNBC interview on Sunday of. Half of it has gone from success to success “ is the vision for coverage to advanced! Artifact, the Intolerable Acts, “ have previously been written with the object of exalting authors... Thoroughly, utterly discredited mainstream journalism today Hannah-Jones will make a fitting addition to that gallery X does not when. Was built ” on slavery what followed was a carefully staged hoax perpetrated by nasa or the Trilateral Commission whatever., though eminently circumspect, concludes that the Apollo 11 moon landing was a stupefying race-based about... States in 1776 that are the world ’ s offices was many years ago, back it., and bond over the stuff you love about, according to this malignant fairy tale was! A larger world process that unfolded over many centuries a sense in which the Pulitzer Prizes and the New Times. Left, Right, and Center lined up to repudiate this racially charged distortion of American slavery to,.